** ALL THESE POSTS ON THIS BLOG ARE LEGAL, FACTUAL, PUBLIC RECORDS AND WILL BE UPHELD IN ANY CHALLENGE. PROVIDING THE PROPER COURT AND JUDICIARY IS IMPARTIAL, UNBIASED AND FOLLOWS THE LAW. THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTS THESE POSTS AS THEY ARE TRUE.
__________________________________________________________________________________
UNLIKE THE FLORIDA CONSTRUCTION, MEDICAL, OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL GROUPS, LAWYERS ARE DISCIPLINED BY THEIR OWN.
SORT OF LIKE THE BIG FAT, CORRUPT RAT DISCIPLINING OR POLICING ITS OWN BAND OF THIEVES AND UNDESIRABLES.
TIME FOR THE FL LEGISLATURE, WHICH IS COMPOSED PREDOMINANTLY OF LAWYERS, TO CHANGE THE LAWS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC, NOT JUST THEIR OWN UNETHICAL, CORRUPT LAWYER MEMBERS.
www.lawyersocala.casa
So complaints legitimately and with valid concerns filed against these unethical, some incompetent, some conflictive lawyers got a slap on the wrist or, in some cases, a FREE DO WHAT YOU WANT TO DO card, were dismissed by the VERY SAME REGULATOR (LMAO) BOARD THAT REGULATES AND "so-called" disciplines ITS OWN.
KYLE LEE BAR # 105321 FAMU 2013
Conflict was admitted once the Plaintiff challenged Lee to disclose why Lee wasn't holding the lawyers of the firm that represented the defendant in Garcia v Shaner Corp. dba Art Ovation Hotel (FLMD) to accountability.
Federal Magistrate Judge Porcelli and then Lammens allowed Lee to withdraw from the case and never addressed the numerous issues of conflict, incompetence, and other clear problems.
Regarding the infamous Batsels of Ocala, the news articles speak for themselves.
ROBERT BATSEL SR BAR # 329703 UF 1981
https://www.facebook.com/groups/505707795175307/posts/985293697216712/
https://www.ocalagazette.com/marion-county-hospital-districts-hiring-of-new-general-counsel-raises-conflict-of-interest-concerns/
https://www.ocalagazette.com/investigation-finds-violations-of-district-policy-threats-from-local-contractor-in-bids-for-new-high-school/
https://www.ocalagazette.com/conflicts-of-interest-questions-surround-city-attorneys/
https://www.facebook.com/groups/505707795175307/posts/991540533258695/
https://www.ocalagazette.com/city-ordered-to-refund-80-million-within-60-days/
https://www.ocalagazette.com/latest-appeal-in-fire-fee-case-called-bid-to-extract-money-from-citizens-attorney/
ROBERT BATSEL JR BAR # 71459 FGCU 2009 (SHUT DOWN)
https://www.ocalagazette.com/city-council-discusses-conflicts-of-interest-with-city-attorney/
PHILIP R LAMMENS BAR # 610501 UF 1982
ROBERT BATSEL JR WAS THE CHAIRMAN OF THE RE-APPOINTMENT COMMISSION THAT APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED PHILIP R LAMMENS TO THE FEDERAL BENCH AS A MAGISTRATE JUDGE IN THE OCALA DIVISION. BATSEL'S FATHER ROBERT SR. IS THE ATTORNEY REPRESENTING REMINGTONS PRIME OCALA LLC IN SEVERAL CASES, ALL PRESIDED OVER BY NONE OTHER THAN PHILIP R. LAMMENS, WHO HAS RULED MANY TIMES IN FAVOR OF REMINGTONS. Ya, Think A CONFLICT exists?
CLEARLY! BUT LAMMENS FAILED TO RECUSE HIMSELF IN THE CASES
GARCIA v REMINGTONS PRIME OCALA LLC FLMD-OCALA
CAMPBELL v REMINGTONS PRIME OCALA FLMD-OCALA
FERRIGNO v REMINGTONS PRIME OCALA FLMD-OCALA
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/59106274/Ferrigno_v_Remingtons_Prime_Ocala_LLC
https://www.ocala-news.com/2025/08/03/ocala-restaurant-sued-by-former-waiter-over-alleged-age-discrimination/
NOW THE JUDGES ON THE CASE ADMONISH THE PLAINTIFF BECAUSE THE PLEADINGS OR MOTIONS ARE NOT TIMES NEW ROMAN, 12 PT TYPEFACE AND MARGINS ARE NOT 1 INCH.
SADLY, PRO SE PLAINTIFFS DON'T HAVE THE TAXPAYER-FUNDED COURT RESOURCES OR THE PRIVATE LAW FIRMS WITH BUCKETS OF CASH TO EXPEND MONEY ON INK, PAPER, ETC.
THE MOTIONS AND PLEADINGS ARE PROPERLY TYPED OUT AND NOT ON CONSTRUCTION PAPER OR IN CRAYON. WHAT A JOKE!!!
THE COURT AND THESE JUDGES ARE CLEARLY PARTIAL TO THE CROOKED LAWYERS.
NEXT TIME YOU HAVE ANY OF THESE LAWYERS ON TEH OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE TABLE, BE PREPARED TO TAKE GOOD NOTES, RECORD IF YOU MUST THE PROCESS AND OUST THEIR LACK OF ETHICS TO ANY MEDIA OUTLET THAT WILL BE COURAGEOUS ENOUGH TO EXPOSE THEM.
IT IS NOT THAT THE ACTIONS OR RULINGS WERE DISASTROUS OR NOT WHAT A PLAINTIFF WANTED TO BE THE OUTCOME OF THEIR CASE.
IT IS THE CLEAR AND UNEQUIVOCAL CONFLICT OR INCOMPETENCE OR LACK OF PURE, CLEAR ETHICS THAT CAUSES THE SYSTEM TO FAIL AND THE PUBLIC TO DISTRUST LAWYERS AND THE COURTS.
- Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck (S.D.N.Y.): In Fischer v. Forrest, Judge Peck condemned vague, generalized Rule 34 boilerplate objections and ruled that non-compliant responses result in a total waiver of all objections except privilege. [1, 2]
- Judge Mark Bennett (N.D. Iowa): In Liguria Foods, Inc. v. Griffith Laboratories, Inc., Judge Bennett ordered counsel to show cause and threatened sanctions for overusing obstructionist boilerplate discovery objections. [1, 2]
- Recycled Complaint Sanctions: Federal judges have also targeted attorneys who recycle identical boilerplate complaints across unrelated clients. For example, a federal judge tossed a workplace bias lawsuit against General Motors after defense counsel pointed out that attorney Hiram McBeth (McBeth Law Office) filed nearly identical "boilerplate" claims across multiple unrelated cases. [1]
- Rule 34 Violations: Modern federal rules require specific grounds, production timelines, and clear statements if documents are being withheld rather than blanket objections.
- Loss of Credibility: Courts view stock, repetitive text as a sign of poor diligence, leading to waived objections, cost-shifting, or direct sanctions.