Skip to main content

UNETHICAL BAD CORRUPT DECEPTIVE FLORIDA ATTORNEYS

https://www.ocalagazette.com/ocalas-fire-fee-strategies-were-flawed-from-inception-to-80-million-judgment/
https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-news/february-1-2025-disciplinary-actions/ https://www.ethicsatlaw.com/blog/blog-post-title-one-2n3bh https://www.floridabar.org/public/acap/

Popular posts from this blog

THE OCALA BATSEL CONFLICT -

https://www.thecitrusinsider.com/the-batsel-conflict/ It is daunting but NOT surprising the Batsel law firm with its lawyers, including the junior level lawyers, are so beleaguered with public articles of CONFLICTS that FL cities, counties and businesses STILL retain it. There has to be a reason they are popular.
Read more

Ocala's Batsel Lawyers (Father & Son) & The Other Son Derek

The unconstitutional and illegal fire rescue fee was the icing on the cake to expose them both. But so is the lies and corruption in the Garcia v Remingtons, Ferrigno v Remingtons, Campbell v Remingtons federal cases. The deadline to cash Ocala fire fee refund checks expired on April 30, 2024, and the remaining uncashed funds have officially reverted to the city. [1, 2]  What Happened to the Refunds:  The Settlement:  A court ordered the City of Ocala to refund nearly $80 million in illegally collected fire service fees charged on utility bills between February 2010 and July 2020.  The Deadline:  Eligible residents and businesses were given a final court-approved extension to cash their checks by April 30, 2024.   Uncashed Funds:  City records showed that nearly 18,000 checks totaling over $7 million went uncollected or uncashed.  $ 7 MILLION OF ILLEGALLY COLLECTED MONIES FOR 1000s of Ocalans ends up back into the city's coffers? WOW, so...
Read more

Florida Bar v. Robert D. Adams (SC14-1054) and The Florida Bar v. Adam Robert Filthaut (SC14-1056)

Florida Supreme Court oral argument in The Florida Bar v. Robert D. Adams (SC14-1054) and The Florida Bar v. Adam Robert Filthaut (SC14-1056) — consolidated attorney discipline cases decided August 25, 2016. The Court unanimously and permanently disbarred all three attorneys involved, calling their conduct "among the most shocking, unethical, and unprofessional as has ever been brought before this Court." So JUNG STOOD BEFORE THE FL SUPREME COURT ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENT? https://www.flmd.uscourts.gov/judges/william-jung **THIS BLOG IS NOT INSISTING, ALLUDING OR OTHERWISE THAT WILLIAM JUNG IS CORRUPT OR OTHERWISE. IT IS MERELY SHARING THE PUBLIC VIDEO OF JUNG BEFORE THE FL SUPREME COURT ON THIS TERRIBLE AND AGHAST LAWYER CASE. BE IT KNOWN AND PUBLISHED THAT JUDGE JUNG WAS THE ASSIGNED JUDGE ON A FLMD CASE INVOLVING A PLAINTIFF IN A RETALIATION CASE FILED IN THE FLMD.
Read more